|
|
swords
Jan 31, 2007 22:29:31 GMT -5
Post by Takkun on Jan 31, 2007 22:29:31 GMT -5
exactally! ;D
|
|
|
|
swords
Feb 7, 2007 17:04:08 GMT -5
Post by Takkun on Feb 7, 2007 17:04:08 GMT -5
k, still tinkering with this deck, i need another [Armed Dragon Lv7] and i still want that [Breaker the Magical Warrior]  |
|
|
|
swords
Feb 7, 2007 17:18:44 GMT -5
Post by Po_ato on Feb 7, 2007 17:18:44 GMT -5
I think I have a LV7
|
|
|
|
swords
Feb 7, 2007 17:26:55 GMT -5
Post by Takkun on Feb 7, 2007 17:26:55 GMT -5
i knew you had 1 po, i tried to get it off you last week, but you were leaving  |
|
|
|
swords
Feb 7, 2007 19:00:29 GMT -5
Post by DTC on Feb 7, 2007 19:00:29 GMT -5
well if fang wasn't a freak about trading certain cards, specifically ioc holos it'd be easier to trade for what you need, rofl.
|
|
|
|
swords
Feb 7, 2007 19:07:03 GMT -5
Post by Takkun on Feb 7, 2007 19:07:03 GMT -5
yeah, it's also cause he likes skrewing with you hippie, lol |
|
Fang
Advance Member
...An Ariatsu Legend...
Posts: 148
|
swords
Feb 16, 2007 20:06:27 GMT -5
Post by Fang on Feb 16, 2007 20:06:27 GMT -5
Ill trade my ioc's but its just so much fun f*ckin wit hippie... |
|
|
|
swords
Feb 16, 2007 21:42:50 GMT -5
Post by Takkun on Feb 16, 2007 21:42:50 GMT -5
see hippie update: i don't need the lv7 anymore, might still want it and the breaker though  |
|
|
|
swords
Feb 17, 2007 9:29:50 GMT -5
Post by DTC on Feb 17, 2007 9:29:50 GMT -5
why me?
|
|
Nagatsu
Administrator
"Akuma no Kanto"
Posts: 4,378
|
swords
Feb 21, 2007 14:20:49 GMT -5
Post by Nagatsu on Feb 21, 2007 14:20:49 GMT -5
well Takkun ya better scratch da Breaker he is banned in da next format  |
|
|
|
swords
Feb 21, 2007 15:55:31 GMT -5
Post by Po_ato on Feb 21, 2007 15:55:31 GMT -5
I don't like that.
|
|
|
|
swords
Feb 21, 2007 17:18:35 GMT -5
Post by DTC on Feb 21, 2007 17:18:35 GMT -5
the only reason i don't is because they were artarded about breaker and didn't bring back mst to 2 or 3 or whatever (which with breaker banned is actually a more intelligent idea because unlike breaker doesn't auto +1 80% of the time unless you use the card right).
otherwise i don't care, breaker and mof can disappear for all i care. People are going to run dust tornado, and other cards to replace the lost staples, i say just replace it with more support cards for a deck theme and stop looking for easy solutions.
No mof = less spell abuse, no breaker = less artard +1 breakers, no graceful = less lucksacking with frogs and night assailant and no dark world lucksacks, and no last will makes sure that artard tactics can't be used.
Because we lost staples, and they completely crippled two of the most consistant otks in the game to a point that it'll hardly ever work properly, i think it's showing there will be much more skill in the game. The only thing that pisses me off is snatch steal, the only card currently around that is a worse lucksack card than graceful charity came back. Seriously, what are they thinking with snatch steal? Now everytime I lose with massive advantage it'll be snatch steal, so far i've lost three times with the new list, once while dueling gadgets, once with my opponent destroying my hand with +2 robbin goblin and don zaloog, and once with a topped snatch steal in the last game when i had +4 but no defense.
|
|
|
|
swords
Feb 21, 2007 22:09:22 GMT -5
Post by Takkun on Feb 21, 2007 22:09:22 GMT -5
well Takkun ya better scratch da Breaker he is banned in da next format oh well mind crush is down to one, that almost kills a deck idea for me, and odds are i won't get to use th line "Wait, did i just kill a gay clown?!"  |
|
]